date: Mon Feb 21 09:32:13 2005
from: Phil Jones 
subject: Re: Zero order draft
to: "Parker, David (Met Office)" 
    David,
       Thanks !  They are calling some people at specific times related to their
    chapter. Looking at the schedule and knowing which ones you've been involved
    with it isn't worth worrying about.  Ch 3 starts at 1.30pm central and Ch 6
    isn't till much later, so late evening UK on 23rd.
       You are probably better off out of it.
    Cheers
    Phil
   At 09:05 21/02/2005, you wrote:
     Phil
     I'm not due to be in the Chicago meeting but will be in my office in
     Exeter during normal hours Mon 21st - Thurs 24th, away Friday. I haven't
     booked a phone link: when that option arose, Peter hadn't had his
     accident; but I have found phone links to be ineffective except for very
     short periods. Videoconferencing can be better.
     Regards
     David
     On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 08:04, Phil Jones wrote:
     >   Peter,
     >      Sorry to here of your problems. Thanks for the comments on the ZOD
     >   and the additional aspects in your email. Let me know any more of the
     >   BAMS letter if you get them. We'll be looking at all the comments from
     >   middle of April onwards. The next AR4 meeting is around May 10.
     >       Some of the reason why some bits you wrote (and also Adrian
     >   Simmons - had a long set of comments from him also) are not there
     >   or have been reduced significantly, is that we've been told to concentrate
     >   on what we do know or not know but not to say what we should be
     >   doing. We'll be questioning this in Beijing. Problems with ERA-40 and
     >   NCEP-NCAR are therefore very brief and also in many other areas. We're
     >   not supposed to endorse the GCOS Imp. Plan for example. Roger Pielke
     >   won't be pleased with this. Ch 6 of the CCSP doc does this and more.
     >   Found this a little too hopeful, saying we can't say anything unless we
     >   have pictures, complete histories etc. etc. Optimistic in the extreme,
     >   although all necessary it could be said in a much better way.
     >
     >     Well, hope you're back on your feet soon and I'll see you when you
     >   hobble up here for a supervisory meeting in March.
     >
     >   Cheers
     >   Phil
     >
     >   PS  David - will you be in Chicago? What time do you get in tomorrow?
     >
     >
     > At 00:25 20/02/2005, Peter Thorne wrote:
     > >Phil (cc: David),
     > >
     > >I'm afraid I won't make Chicago ... will probably be under surgeons knife.
     > >Have taken today to try to write up some more lucid notes on the zero
     > >order draft that are attached and are what I would have discussed with you
     > >at Chicago. I leave it up to you how far these notes are forwarded on.
     > >
     > >I have to say that I still back my initial reaction despite that being
     > >seen as a "diatribe". I included the salient emails as an appendix as
     > >there's some additional material in them that might help. At this stage
     > >I'm pretty sure we can reconcile these things relatively simply. However,
     > >I certainly would be unhappy to be associated with it if the current text
     > >remains through final draft - I'm absolutely positive it won't.
     > >
     > >As an aside for your eyes only (so please don't forward this part on to
     > >anyone) there may well be a very large signatory letter to BAMS from
     > >operational satellite guys that Fu et al. is wrong which is one reason why
     > >I want to avoid the impression given in zero order draft - it may make us
     > >all painted into a difficult corner. More will be obvious after TOVS
     > >workshop in May / June but things may move dramatically one way or the
     > >other so just a heads up.
     > >
     > >I note that my box on the lapse rates was completely and utterly ignored
     > >which may explain to some extent my reaction, but I also think the science
     > >is being manipulated to put a political spin on it which for all our sakes
     > >might not be too clever in the long run.
     > >
     > >I hope Chicago ends up being okay. By the end of it hopefully we'll be in
     > >a position to make sure the first draft is good. I should still be able to
     > >make a March supervisory meeting albeit as the crutched wonder and we can
     > >discuss further then.
     > >
     > >Cheers
     > >
     > >Peter
     >
     > Prof. Phil Jones
     > Climatic Research Unit        Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090
     > School of Environmental Sciences    Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784
     > University of East Anglia
     > Norwich                          Email    p.jones@uea.ac.uk
     > NR4 7TJ
     > UK
     >
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     --
     David E Parker
     A2_W052 Met Office FitzRoy Road EXETER EX1 3PB UK
     email: david.parker@metoffice.gov.uk
     Tel: +44-1392-886649     Fax: +44-1392-885681
     Global climate data sets are available from [1]http://hadobs.org
   Prof. Phil Jones
   Climatic Research Unit        Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090
   School of Environmental Sciences    Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784
   University of East Anglia
   Norwich                          Email    p.jones@uea.ac.uk
   NR4 7TJ
   UK
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------