date: Mon Apr 28 10:44:32 2008
from: Tim Osborn <t.osborn@uea.ac.uk>
subject: Re: tadaa
to: Ian Harris <i.harris@uea.ac.uk>

   Hi -- correlations look good, 1961-1990 means look good, but amplitude of anomalies still
   considerably out.  Not a simple factor of 10 either.  But perhaps a combination of factor
   of 10 for synth and correct factor for real observations?  Can I have permission to read
   (i) the new contents of rd0syn (presumably these are the new synthetics?) and (iii)
   rd0_gts_anom.pro in the BADC_AREA (presumably this is the prog you are now using to
   combine/grid things?).
   Cheers
   Tim
   At 23:27 27/04/2008, you wrote:

     Hi Tim
     The latest version of WET (blimey, it's worse than Miscrosoft Service Packs) is in the
     usual place:
     /cru/cruts/version_3_0/secondaries/wet/wet_final/
     Please say it looks OK! Well actually scaling isn't a problem, I accept that the anom
     version of the synthetics generator might produce different;y scaled output, I just want
     it to look realistic!
     Cheers
     H