date:          Mon, 29 Sep 1997 12:42:23 +0100
from: Iain Reddish <Iain.Reddish@ams.greenpeace.org>
subject:       Sceptics Project
to: m.hulme@uea.ac.uk

Hi, Mike,

Following up:


1.   Hopefully you received my two e-mail messages: one with full set 
of questions; the other with specific allocation for answer


2.   When reasonably could you deliver?


3.   As explained, preferred format would be a one/two sentence quick 
reply, followed by a 2/3 par more focused explanation/justification, 
including where necessary any IPCC quotes. Although there will be a 
final drafting here by Greenpeace, still useful to remember the 
target gropup  -  the final paper is aimed at non-specialist 
journalists who will be covering Kyoto, & non science graduate GP 
Campaigners worldwide who are likely to have to field questions 


4.   Let me know your sense of consultancy fee  - or how long it will 
take  -  so that I can start organising payment this end


5.   Time lines: (Difficult one as not being a scientist it's almost 
impossible to assess with any accuracy).  Hopefully end of week -  
Tues/Wed next week final final final  .... although it might be a 
good idea if you were maybe to feed back two or three answers once 
completed


6.   Slight amendment to 3 of the questions, (all quasi-typos):

Question 12         ......  should read "1963 & 1986"  (not 1963 & 
                                                               1968)

Question 26 (a)     ...  should read "radio sondes" not "radio sounds"


Question 32         ....... "the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere 
both promotes GROWTH and reduces the demand for water .........."


 
I'll call you in a bit  


Cheers


Iain