date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:42:26 +0100 from: Tim Osborn subject: Re: FWD: [Fwd: response--comments?] to: f028 ,k.briffa@uea.ac.uk At 10:57 27/06/2005, f028 wrote: >Keith and Tim, > Probably best to stay out of this, but Caspar > is here at the meeting near Rome, so he sent me this > email response from Mike. Our emails crossed - I sent a supportative email to MBH with a copy of our MAGICC-vs-ECHO-G manuscript and I dug out the email that Sonja B-C had sent after publishing M&M. But after just now reading Mike's draft response that you forwarded, which is in Mike's usual provocative rather than placatory tone(!), I will keep a low profile as you suggests. However... > I seem to get a mention in the letter to Pacchauri. ...they may well be asking for all the temperature station data again, since this is indeed raised in the IPCC letter - "Are the data and methodologies for such works complete and available for other researchers to test and replicate?" I'd guess your US DoE funding means that you would be under some obligation to respond if they were to direct their enquiry towards you! Hope Rome's not too unbearable - 37C on the forecast! Cheers Tim Dr Timothy J Osborn Climatic Research Unit School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK e-mail: t.osborn@uea.ac.uk phone: +44 1603 592089 fax: +44 1603 507784 web: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~timo/ sunclock: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~timo/sunclock.htm